Worldview draft

THE SPECTRUM OF TRADITIONAL HUMAN WORLDVIEWS

EIGHTH Paradigm  SEVENTH Paradigm
Left Systematists
SIXTH Paradigm
Left Marginalists
FIFTH Paradigm
Left Middle Marginalists
FOURTH Paradigm
Middle Marginalists
THIRD Paradigm
Right Middle Marginalists
      SECOND Paradigm
Right Marginalists
FIRST Paradigm
Right Systematists
POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY
GALACTIC  UTOPIAN PROGRESSIVE  LIBERAL MODERATE CONSERVATIVE  BI-PARTISAN  AUTHORITATIVE
Cosmology COSMOGENISIS EMMANATIONISM
“CONSCIOUSLY” “ENFOLDED” INTO ‘MATERIAL’ MANIFESTATION
BY ETERNALLY-EXISTING INFINITELY-UN-BOUNDED “SEA” OF TOTALLY UN-“DIFFERENTIATED” CONSCIOUSNESS

“DEITY”-CREATED COSMOS
AUTOMATED (“NATURAL”)
“CONDENSATION” FROM
PRE-EXISTING
“SEA” OF CONSCIOUSNESS
PRE-“BIG BANG” ORIGIN YET TO BE “SCIENTIFICALLY” ASCERTAINED CIVIL-RELIGION “GOD”
“GOD”-CREATED UNIVERSE
PERPETUAL SELF-CONTAINED,
SELF-EXISTING COSMOS
ENTIRELY UNEXPLAINED
“BIG BANG” ORIGIN
Teleology “We” are “evolving”, incarnation-by-reincarnation, progressively  toward DIS-‘Incarnate’

CONSCIOUSNESS

 POST-“CONSCIOUSLY”   ENFOLDED-INTO- MATERIAL MANIFESTATION

MOVEMENT TO “THE “ESCHATON”

POST-DEITY-CREATED NATURAL LAW FUNCTIONING               BUT HUMAN-“INTENTION” “QUANTUM”

CO-CREATED UNFOLDING

          ENTIRELY “NATURAL LAW”  FUNCTIONING POST-ULTIMATE EXPANSION CONDITION (and TELEOLOGY)

YET TO BE “SCIENTIFICALLY” DETERMINED

THE PERPETUALLY-OSCILLATING HUMAN WILL- INFLUENCED-UNFOLDING

OSCILLATING COSMOS

THE PERPETUALLY-OSCILLATING MECHANICALLY PRE-DETERMINED COSMOS

(THE ETERNAL RETURN)

TIME-LIMITED EXPANDING & CONCURRENTLY TOTALLY DISINTEGRATING COSMOS -UNTO NO-“THING”-NESS

(ENTROPY)

Ontology We, as a Human Family, Must Now Integrate The Fact that  “Consciousness” “evolves” elsewhere in our Universe       VASTLY BEYOND      the state of Materially-“Incarnated” Consciousness that OUR VERY MOST-EVOLVED “Human Beings” have EVER attained  (including Jesus; Buddha, Mohammad & THE MACHTI) Every  Inchoate Quantum Field is a “HOLO-GRAPHIC” “Nodal” or “Micro-Cosm” of  The Eternal  “Cosmic Consciousness” “joined” in constant intimate communion with

ONE BEING

“Consciousness” is the experience directly experienced by an adequately-complex confluence of “Mass” & “Energy” of a  subtle electro-magnetic “Field” that “bonds together” every  Inchoate Quantum Field in The Entire Universe into ONE,

UNIFIED & HARMONIOUS WHOLE

“Consciousness” is a “Point of Focused Intuitive Attention”

From the “Perspective” from which an “entity” can intuit data “relative” to the “self” experienced by that”entity”

Certain “Things” (or “Entifications” of  “Mass”and”Energy”) Manifest “Consciousness” (which appears, “Scientifically”, to be Some Type of “Electro-Dynamic” Phenominon) –

BUT this requires MORE “Scientific” Research to Determine What “Consciousness” is

“Consciousness” is an “Integral” “Third Element” of “Material” Reality with “Mass” & “Energy”  “Consciousness” is a “Mechanical
“Epi-Phenominon” of  The  Physical Inter-Action   Between “Mass” & “Energy”    “generated” by an  Adequately Complex  Mechanical “Confluence” of
“Mass” & “Energy”
               PANPSYCISM                     Every “Thing”  in The Universe is     More – or  Less “Conscious”, Merely to a  Greater  or Lesser Degree
Epistemology We Human Beings NOW have access to the NEW Information  Provided by The Extra-Terrestrial Species to “Supplement” our Human Knowledge We Human Beings CAN RELIABLY GIVE CENTRAL IMPORTANCE TO the “data” that we discern through the exercise of TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION (or “Prayer”) to add to the data obtained via our Human Intuition – as a “factor” having EQUAL VALUE to the data that we come to KNOW via the direct experience of Our Five Physical Senses; via The Traditions Conserved By Our Ancestors & And Via Our Utilization of “The Scientific Method” – because we are CONFIDENT NOT ONLY that our Human Intuition IS the function of some merely as yet NON-“Scientifically”- Confirmed “Biological Faculty” …much like “Seeing” or “Hearing” or “Tasting” or “Smelling”  BUT ALSO that we Human Beings possess YET ANOTHER Human “Faculty” that is able to directly “access” THE INFINITE & ETERNAL “SEA” OF UN-DIFFERENTIATED
CONSCIOUSNESS
We Human Beings CAN RELIABLY GIVE CENTRAL IMPORTANCE TO the “data” that we discern through the exercise of our Human Intuition – as a “factor” having EQUAL VALUE to the data that we come to KNOW via the direct experience of Our Five Physical Senses; via The Traditions Conserved By Our Ancestors & And Via Our Utilization of “The Scientific Method” – because we are CONFIDENT that our Human Intuition IS the function of some merely as yet NON-“Scientifically”- Confirmed “Biological Faculty” …much like “Seeing” or “Hearing” or “Tasting” or “Smelling” We Human Beings CAN RELIABLY “supplement” the data that we come to KNOW via the direct experience of Our Five Physical Senses; via The Traditions Conserved By Our Ancestors & And Via Our Utilization of “The Scientific Method” THROUGH  the partial integration into our “rational” analysis of our HUMAN INTUITION – which MAY HAVE some as-yet NON-“Scientifically”- Confirmed Validity We Human Beings CAN “KNOW” data – but ONLY data that which has been subjected to – and generated by – “The Scientific Method” We Human Beings can also KNOW data that has been “conveyed” to him BY HIS “TRADITIONS” CONSERVED BY THOSE WHO HAVE GONE BEFORE We Human Beings  (In Addition To The Direct “Sense Data” That We Directly Experience Via Our FIVE [ONLY]  Physical Senses) CAN    ALSO Subtly “Discern” The Eternally On-Going DUAL-istic Dynamic Taking Place in Our Oscillating Cosmos Each Human Being can TRULY KNOW only The Direct “Sense Data” That  He or She Directly Personally Experiences Via His or Her    FIVE (ONLY)    Physical Senses
Mode of Ethical Reasoning We must “Take Into Account” in Determining What is “Best” for Us, As a Species, to Do

How This Choice Affects Our Relationship With This Extra-Terrestrial Civilization

Seeking to Comport One’s Own Personal Conduct In Accordance With The Perfect ULTIMATE OBJECTIVE of THE CREATOR OF The Universe – And To Assist, By Way Of One’s Own Personal Example, Our Human Family to Voluntarily Do The Same Collectively Seeking To Comport One’s Personal Conduct In a Manner That Most Perfectly “Harmonizes” With The Natural Order of The Universe – and To Attempt to Persuade, By Reasoned Argument Continuing to utilize “The Scientific Method” as the means of determining “Fact”                                  and continuing to “supplement” that data by giving “ancillary” weight to data obtained thru “Intuition”

BUT

Remaining “open” to increasing the “weight” to be given to intuition-generated data

if that data calls for treating “The Least Well Offer” even BETTER

Insisting upon subjecting all propositions of fact   to                                   The Scientific Method

BUT

GENUINELY & OBJECTIVELY Exploring “Revolutionary” Thesies

Including the prospect that we human beings possess “other ways of knowing” than the presently-“scientifically-acknowledged” “senses”

Remaining supportive and “advocational” of “Traditional” values, customs & insight                BUT                                  Respecting and being willing to “feather in” CONSTRUCTIVE     progressive “amendments” Making all decisions by remaining “open” to the CONSTRUCTIVE Dialectical Dynamic of the TAOIST inter-action between TWO only apparently “conflicting” Energies Making “AuthoritTATIVE           but NOT AuthoritARIAN

leadership decisions

in the interests of the entire “community” of people – as though they were ALL one’s personal family

Philosophy PanenTheism Radical Monism Pythagoreanism Aristotlianism Nathan Adler Lao Tsu Heraclitus
Political Philosophy Democratic Theocracy Gnosticism Spiritual Communitarianism Pure Democracy Republic Two-Party Democracy Authoritative Autocracy
Theory of Human Psychology
Mode of Spiritual Expression:

World Religion 
Mysticism Zen Buddhism Islamic Sufism Monastic Christianity Kabalistic Judaism Taoism Pantheism
Social Order Utopian
Planetary Representative Theological  Council
Progressive
Global Multi-Continental  Intuition-Guided Council
              Idealistic
Inter-Continental Bio-Regional
Social Democracy
Moderate
Continental Bio-Regional Democracy
Conservative
Multi-Bio-Regional Nationalism
Bi-partisan Bio-Regional-ism  Authoritative Intra-Bio-Regionalism
 Modern Exponent The Dali Lama,
Desmond Tutu,
Dom Helder Camara
   Deepak Chopra Vaclav Havel Jimmy Carter King David of Israel King Leonidas of Themopylae Auda Abu Tayi of the Howeitat Bedouin Arabs
End Higher Manifestation
Faculty Soul ESP See Hear Smell Taste Touch
Musical Key B A G F E D C
Verb Am Intuit Communicate Love Think Will Act
Chakra Crown Chakra Brow Chakra Throat Chakra Heart Chakra Solar Plexus Chakra Sacral Chakra Root Chakra
Function Being Intuition Communication Love Power Assertion Procreation Survival
Form of Matter Spirit Quantum Subatomic Atomic Gaseous Liquid Solid
Body Divine Monadic Atomic Buddhist Mental Astral Physical
Scope Trans-Cosmic Cosmic Planetary Continent Nation Tribe (Race) Family
Lower Manifestation
Cosmology William Stroeger Keppler Steven Hawking Copernican Eternal Oscillation Entropy
Teleology Teilhard de Chardin:
Escatology
 Max Plank John Locke Scientific Logical Perfectionism Kierkegard Frederick Hegel
Dialectical Progression
Charles Darwin:
Random Evolution
Ontology Spinoza
Heidegger
Speculative Realists
Mme. Helen Blavatsky Plato
“Plato’s Ontology or Philosophy of Being/Reality” at (rlwclarke.net/courses/lits2306/ 2011-2012PlatoOverview
Aristotle’s Ontology
(See: stromatais.blogspot.com/2011/02/ aristotles-ontology.html)
Newton’s “Scholium” in his Naturalis Principia Mathematica (See: “Newton’s Neo-Platonic Ontology of Space” by Edward Slowik at philsci-archive.pitt.edu/4184/) Dialectical Ontology

John Scottus Eriugena

        Daniel Dennett                              “Dan Dennett on Patterns and Ontology” at www.replicatedtypo.com/dan-dennett-on-patterns-and-ontology/10849.html)
Epistemology Theology Philo Thomas Aquinas Emanuel Kant David Hume  

Epicurius

Mode of Ethical Reasoning Voluntarily comporting one’s conduct – and openly advocating that our collective conduct be comported – pursuant to the effectuation of the teleological objective of The Infinite & Eternal Sea of Entirely Un-Differentiated Consciousness Having Enfolded Into Material Manifestation The Material Universe  

Voluntarily comporting one’s own conduct – and openly advocating that our collective conduct be conducted – in sympathetic resonance with – the vibrational frequency of the Unitive Phenomenon of The Universe 

Seeking “The Greatest Good For The Greatest Number” – While, at the same time,    At Least Something For   The Least Well-Off

John Rawles

Seeking “The Greatest Good For The Greatest Number”: “Mechanical” Non-“Transcendent” Principle “Compromise” – Between “Extremes”

John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham

The Assertion of One’s WILL To Promote The Interests of One’s NATION over an “Other” Nation

 

The “Vanquishing” of The Ultimate Other”
To Promote The Interests of One’s TRIBE (or Race)
Immediate Self Interest Seeking of One’s Own Personal Gratification in the form of POWER, RICHES OF MATERIAL GOODS, SEXUAL SATISFACTION & FAME (sometimes in the service of one’s personal FAMILY)
Philosophy Theism Radical Monism Pythagoras Aristotelianism
Aristotle
Existentialism:
Jean Paul Sartre
    Dialectical Materialism
Karl Marx
Hedonism
Thomas Hobbs
Political Philosophy Utopian Natural Law
(Progressive)
Social Democrats
(Liberal)
Representative Democracy
(Moderate)
Republicans
(Conservative)
Neitsche, Adam Smith, Karl Marx
(Reactionary)
Machiavelli
(Authoritarian)
Theory of Human Psychology William James Carl Jung Cognitive
Jean Piaget
Humanistic
Abraham Maslow, Carl Rogers
Socio-Cultural/Behavioral
B.F. Skinner
Psycho-analytical
FREUDIAN
Erik Erikson
Neuro-scientific
Structuralism
Mode of Spiritual Expression Gnosticism Occult Theosophy Pythagorism Platonism Scholastic Catholicism Israeli Judeaism Secular State Religion Voodooism
Utopian Progressive Liberal Moderate Conservative Reactionary Totalitarian
Social Order Theocratic Honestly-Educated  & Objectively-Selected
Meritocracy
 Alexandrian Philosopher       King & Meritocratically-Elected Representative Bicameral
Parliamentarian Democracy
Religious Monarchism State Capitalism
vs. State Communism
Authoritarian Dictatorship
Modern Exponent Evelyn Underhill Vaclav Havel Z. Brzezinsky Mario Cuomo Samuel Huntington Henry Kissinger Richard Perl