Worldviews

Cosmology

COSMOGENISIS

EMMANATIONISM “CONSCIOUSLY” “ENFOLDED” INTO ‘MATERIAL’ MANIFESTATION BY ETERNALLY-EXISTING INFINITELY-UN-BOUNDED “SEA” OF TOTALLY UN-“DIFFERENTIATED” CONSCIOUSNESS

DEITY – CREATED COSMOS

AUTOMATED (“NATURAL”) “CONDENSATION” FROM PRE-EXISTING “SEA” OF CONSCIOUSNESS

PRE-“BIG BANG” ORIGIN YET TO BE SCIENTIFICALLY ASCERTAINED

CIVIL-RELIGION “GOD” “GOD”-CREATED UNIVERSE

PERPETUAL SELF-CONTAINED, SELF-EXISTING COSMOS

ENTIRELY UNEXPLAINED “BIG BANG” ORIGIN

Teleology

We are evolving, incarnation-by-reincarnation, progressively  toward DIS-‘Incarnate’ CONSCIOUSNESS

POST-CONSCIOUSLY  ENFOLDED-INTO- MATERIAL MANIFESTATION MOVEMENT TO “THE “ESCHATON”

POST-DEITY-CREATED NATURAL LAW FUNCTIONING BUT HUMAN-“INTENTION” “QUANTUM” CO-CREATED UNFOLDING

ENTIRELY “NATURAL LAW” FUNCTIONING

POST-ULTIMATE EXPANSION CONDITION (and TELEOLOGY) YET TO BE SCIENTIFICALLY DETERMINED

THE PERPETUALLY-OSCILLATING HUMAN WILL-INFLUENCED-UNFOLDING OSCILLATING COSMOS

THE PERPETUALLY-OSCILLATING  MECHANICALLY PRE-DETERMINED COSMOS (THE ETERNAL RETURN)

TIME-LIMITED EXPANDING & CONCURRENTLY TOTALLY DISINTEGRATING COSMOS -UNTO NO-“THING”-NESS (ENTROPY)

Ontology

We, as a Human Family, Must Now Integrate The Fact that  “Consciousness” “evolves” elsewhere in our Universe VASTLY BEYOND the state of Materially-“Incarnated” Consciousness that OUR VERY MOST-EVOLVED “Human Beings” have EVER attained  (including Jesus; Buddha, Mohammad & THE MACHTI)

Every  Inchoate Quantum Field is a “HOLO-GRAPHIC” “Nodal” or “Micro-Cosm” of  The Eternal  “Cosmic Consciousness” “joined” in constant intimate communion with ONE BEING

“Consciousness” is the experience directly experienced by an adequately-complex confluence of “Mass” & “Energy” of a  subtle electro-magnetic “Field” that “bonds together” every  Inchoate Quantum Field in The Entire Universe  into ONE, UNIFIED & HARMONIOUS WHOLE

“Consciousness” is a “Point of Focused  Intuitive Attention” From the “Perspective” from which an “entity” can intuit data “relative” to the “self”  experienced by that”entity”

Certain Things (or “Entifications” of  Mass and Energy”)  Manifest  “Consciousness”  (which  appears, Scientifically, to be Some Type of “Electro-Dynamic” Phenomenon) BUT this requires more Scientific Research to Determine What “Consciousness” is

“Consciousness” is an “Integral” “Third Element” of “Material” Reality with “Mass” & “Energy”

“Consciousness” is a Mechanical Epi – Phenomenon of  The  Physical Inter-Action Between “Mass” & “Energy” “generated” by an  Adequately Complex  Mechanical  “Confluence” of “Mass” & “Energy”

PANPSYCISM Every “Thing”  in The Universe is More – or  Less “Conscious”, Merely to a  Greater  or Lesser Degree

Epistemology

We Human Beings NOW have access to the NEW Information  Provided by The Extra-Terrestrial Species to “Supplement” our Human Knowledge

We Human Beings CAN RELIABLY GIVE CENTRAL IMPORTANCE TO the “data” that we discern through the exercise of TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION (or “Prayer”) to add to the data obtained via our Human Intuition – as a “factor” having EQUAL VALUE to the data that we come to KNOW via the direct experience of Our Five Physical Senses; via The Traditions Conserved By Our Ancestors & And Via Our Utilization of “The Scientific Method” – because we are CONFIDENT NOT ONLY that our Human Intuition IS the function of some merely as yet NON-Scientifically – Confirmed “Biological Faculty” …much like “Seeing” or “Hearing” or “Tasting” or “Smelling”  BUT ALSO that we Human Beings possess YET ANOTHER Human “Faculty” that is able to directly “access” THE INFINITE & ETERNAL “SEA” OF UN -DIFFERENTIATED  CONSCIOUSNESS

We Human Beings CAN RELIABLY GIVE CENTRAL IMPORTANCE TO the “data” that we discern through the exercise of our Human Intuition – as a “factor” having EQUAL VALUE to the data that we come to KNOW via the direct experience of Our Five Physical Senses; via The Traditions Conserved By Our Ancestors & And Via Our Utilization of “The Scientific Method” – because we are CONFIDENT that our Human  Intuition IS the function of some merely as yet NON – Scientifically Confirmed  Biological  Faculty …much like “Seeing” or “Hearing” or “Tasting” or “Smelling”

We Human Beings CAN RELIABLY “supplement” the data that we come to KNOW via the direct experience of Our Five Physical Senses; via The Traditions Conserved By Our Ancestors & And Via Our Utilization of “The Scientific Method” THROUGH  the partial integration into our “rational” analysis of our HUMAN  INTUITION – which MAY HAVE some as-yet NON-“Scientifically”- Confirmed Validity

We Human Beings CAN “KNOW” data – but ONLY data that which has been subjected to – and generated by – “The Scientific Method”

We Human Beings can also KNOW data that has been “conveyed” to him BY HIS TRADITIONS  CONSERVED BY THOSE WHO HAVE GONE BEFORE

We Human Beings  (In Addition To The Direct “Sense Data” That We  Directly  Experience Via Our FIVE [ONLY] Physical  Senses) CAN ALSO Subtly “Discern” The Eternally On-Going   DUAL-istic Dynamic Taking Place in Our Oscillating Cosmos

Each Human Being can TRULY KNOW  only The Direct “Sense  Data” That  He or She Directly Personally Experiences Via His or Her FIVE (ONLY) Physical Senses

Mode of Ethical Reasoning

We must “Take Into Account” in Determining What is “Best” for Us, As a Species, to Do How This Choice Affects Our Relationship With This Extra-Terrestrial Civilization

Seeking to Comport One’s Own Personal Conduct In Accordance With The Perfect ULTIMATE OBJECTIVE of THE CREATOR OF The Universe – And To Assist, By Way Of One’s Own Personal Example, Our Human Family to Voluntarily Do The Same Collectively

Seeking To Comport One’s Personal Conduct In a Manner That Most Perfectly “Harmonizes” With The Natural Order of The Universe – and To Attempt to Persuade, By Reasoned Argument

Continuing to utilize “The Scientific Method” as the means of determining “Fact” and continuing to “supplement” that data by giving “ancillary” weight to data obtained thru “Intuition”  BUT Remaining “open” to increasing the “weight” to be given to intuition-generated  data if that data calls for treating “The Least Well Offer” even BETTER

Insisting upon subjecting all propositions of fact to The Scientific Method  BUT GENUINELY & OBJECTIVELY Exploring “Revolutionary” Theses,  Including the prospect that we human beings possess “other ways of knowing” than the presently-“scientifically-acknowledged” “senses”

Remaining supportive and “avocational” of “Traditional” values, customs & insight BUT Respecting and being willing to “feather in” CONSTRUCTIVE  progressive “amendments”

Making all decisions by remaining “open” to the CONSTRUCTIVE Dialectical Dynamic of the TAOIST inter-action between TWO only apparently “conflicting” Energies

Making “AuthoritTATIVE but NOT AuthoritARIAN  leadership decisions in the interests of the entire “community” of people – as though they were ALL one’s personal family

Philosophy

PanenTheism

Radical Monism

Pythagoreanism

Aristotlianism

Nathan Adler

Lao Tsu

Heraclitus

Political Philosophy

Democratic Theocracy

Gnosticism

Spiritual Communitarianism

Pure Democracy

Republic

Two-Party Democracy

Authoritative Autocracy

Mode of Spiritual Expression: World Religion

Mysticism

Zen Buddhism

Islamic Sufism

Monastic Christianity

Kabalistic Judaism

Taoism

Pantheism

Social Order

Utopian Planetary Representative Theological  Council

Progressive Global Multi-Continental  Intuition-Guided Council

Idealistic Inter-Continental Bio-Regional Social Democracy

Moderate Continental Bio-Regional Democracy

Conservative Multi-Bio-Regional Nationalism

Bi-partisan Bio-Regional-ism

Authoritative Intra- Bio-Regionalism

Modern Exponent

The Dali Lama, Desmond Tutu, Dom Helder Camara

Deepak Chopra

Vaclav Havel

Jimmy Carter

King David of Israel

King Leonidas of Thermopylae

Auda Abu Tayi of the Howeitat Bedouin Arabs

Lower Manifestation

Cosmology

William Stroeger

Keppler

Steven Hawking

Copernican

Eternal Oscillation

Entropy

Teleology

Teilhard de Chardin: Eschatology

Max Plank

John Locke

Scientific Logical Perfectionism

Kierkegard

Frederick Hegel Dialectical Progression

Charles Darwin: Random Evolution

Ontology

Spinoza Heidegger Speculative Realists

Mme. Helen Blavatsky

Plato “Plato’s Ontology or Philosophy of Being/Reality”

Aristotle’s Ontology (See: stromatais.blogspot.com/2011/02/ aristotles-ontology.html)

Newton’s “Scholium” in his Naturalis Principia Mathematica (See: “Newton’s Neo-Platonic Ontology of Space” by Edward Slowik at philsci-archive.pitt.edu/4184/)

Dialectical Ontology John Scottus Eriugena

Daniel Dennett “Dan Dennett on Patterns and Ontology” at www.replicatedtypo.com/dan-dennett-on-patterns-and-ontology/10849.html)

Epistemology

Theology

Philo

Thomas Aquinas

Emanuel Kant

David Hume

Epicurus

Mode of Ethical Reasoning

Voluntarily comporting one’s conduct – and openly advocating that our collective conduct be comported – pursuant to the effectuation of the teleological objective of The Infinite & Eternal Sea of Entirely Un-Differentiated Consciousness Having Enfolded Into Material Manifestation The Material Universe

Voluntarily comporting one’s own conduct – and openly advocating that our collective conduct be conducted – in sympathetic resonance with – the vibrational frequency of the Unitive Phenomenon of The Universe

Seeking “The Greatest Good For The Greatest Number” – While, at the same time, At Least Something For   The Least Well-Off John Rawles

Seeking “The Greatest Good For The Greatest Number”: Mechanical Non-“Transcendent” Principle Compromise Between Extremes John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham

The Assertion of One’s WILL To Promote The Interests of One’s NATION over an “Other” Nation

The “Vanquishing” of The Ultimate Other” To Promote The Interests of One’s TRIBE (or Race)

Immediate Self Interest Seeking of One’s Own Personal Gratification in the form of POWER, RICHES OF MATERIAL GOODS, SEXUAL SATISFACTION & FAME (sometimes in the service of one’s personal FAMILY)

Philosophy

Theism

Radical Monism

Pythagoras

Aristotelianism Aristotle

Existentialism Jean Paul Sartre

Dialectical Materialism Karl Marx

Hedonism Thomas Hobbs

Political Philosophy

Utopian

Natural Law (Progressive)

Social Democrats (Liberal)

Representative Democracy (Moderate)

Republicans (Conservative)

Neitzsche, Adam Smith, Karl Marx (Reactionary)

Machiavelli (Authoritarian)

Theory of Human Psychology

William James

Carl Jung

Cognitive Jean Piaget

Humanistic Abraham Maslow, Carl Rogers

Socio-Cultural/Behavioral B.F. Skinner

Psycho-analytical FREUDIAN Erik Erikson

Neuro-scientific Structuralism

Mode of Spiritual Expression

Gnosticism

Occult Theosophy

Pythagorism, Platonism

Scholastic Catholicism

Israeli Judaism

Secular State Religion

Voodooism

Social Order

Theocratic

Honestly-Educated  & Objectively – Selected Meritocracy

Alexandrian Philosopher King & Meritocratically – Elected

Representative Bicameral Parliamentarian Democracy

Religious Monarchism

State Capitalism vs. State Communism

Authoritarian Dictatorship

Modern Exponent

Evelyn Underhill

Vaclav Havel

Z. Brzezinsky

Mario Cuomo

Samuel Huntington

Henry Kissinger

Richard Perl